Brandon Craig ’09 Presents Paper on Fighting Housing Discrimination
Brandon Craig ’09 presented his paper “Black Zip Codes matter: Fighting Housing Discrimination in the 21st Century,” at the recent David A. Clarke School of Law, University of the District of Columbia Law Review Symposium. The symposium’s theme was “From Protest Movements of the ‘60s to #BlackLivesMatter: Legal Strategies for an Emerging Civil Rights Movement.”
In his paper, Mr. Craig covers the historic change in the laws leading to the passage of the fair housing act in 1968. He then goes on to discuss the changes in the enforcement of the fair housing act up to the present, finishing with how we must change our arguments going forward in the 21st Century.
Here's a link to the symposium to view the presentation: Craig Presentation
Former Dean Victor Schwartz Publishes WSJ Editorial on Federal Legislation and Liability of Gun Manufacturers
Remarks from Victor Schwartz: In the Presidential campaign an issue has been raised about federal legislation and the liability of gun manufacturers. A lot of misinformation about that topic has come forward from a variety of sources. Since I have been involved with most federal liability bills over the past three decades, I thought it might be helpful to clarify just what the federal legislation on gun manufacturer liability titled, “The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" actually does in fact. On March 2, 2016 the Wall Street Journal ran Mr. Schwartz’s op-ed on the topic.
Sue Erhart '96 promoted to General Counsel at Great American Insurance
Great American Insurance Group has named two new leaders for its legal team. Sue Erhart has been promoted to general counsel, while Eve Cutler Rosen has been named executive counsel within its Property and Casualty Legal Group.
Erhart will continue to have direct responsibility for the staff and operations of the Property and Casualty Group’s Legal Department in her new role. She joined Great American in June 2010 after she became a partner at Cincinnati’s Keating, Muething & Klekamp PLL. She received her bachelor’s degree from Xavier University and earned a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Rosen will oversee the company’s international operations in her new role and serve as senior counsel for the Property and Casualty Group. She has been general counsel since August 1999 and worked for Great American for 29 years. She previously worked at Aetna and was in private practice in Philadelphia. She earned a bachelor’s degree from Bryn Mawr College and Juris Doctor degree from Villanova University School of Law.
Great American primarily focuses on property and casualty insurance for businesses along with the sale of traditional fixed and fixed-indexed annuities in the retail, financial institutions and education markets. It’s a subsidiary of American Financial Group (NYSE: AFG), which is also based in Cincinnati.
As published in bizjournals.com
Constitutional Law Professor Verna Williams Pens Editorial on Merrick Garland Supreme Court Nomination
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell insists that Republican refusal to act on President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court is based on principle. Lawmakers merely are continuing to follow the Biden rule. This declaration suggests that, rather than engaging in unparalleled obstructionism, Republican senators are observing one of their esteemed traditions, like eating bean soup in the Capitol cafeteria.
But, the full text of Biden’s 1992 speech on the Senate floor suggests otherwise.
It was late June. The nation and Senate were recovering from bruising hearings to confirm Clarence Thomas. Re-examining the Judiciary Committee’s handling of professor Anita Hill’s allegations of sexual harassment, Biden explained that “many questioned whether we took professor Hill’s charges seriously, investigated them thoroughly, and disseminated them appropriately.” While Biden concluded that he and his colleagues had done their best, given Hill’s desire for confidentiality, he nonetheless believed a new set of rules should apply going forward. He announced that the committee would:
- Advise sources that any information the committee obtained would be placed in a nominee’s FBI file and be available on a confidential basis to the Senate before voting on the nomination.
- Hold closed, confidential sessions about all Supreme Court nominees.
- Meet routinely with nominees in closed session, on the record, and under oath about any investigative charges.
Throughout the process, senators would be able to review any documents, reports or transcripts in a manner that protected confidentiality.
Those are the Biden rules; they appear toward the end of his speech.
Conspicuously absent in that context, in which Biden clearly is setting forth how the Judiciary Committee would do business, is any suggestion that it would abandon its constitutional duty to engage in the confirmation process during an election year. But, in discussing the history of such nominations, Biden noted that when a president sought to appoint a justice in the summer or fall of an election year – just a few months before the election – that typically resulted in failure. In contrast, when the president selected candidates before the summer, the Senate confirmed them.
Not a rule. An observation.
Assuming it applies to the current situation, as Republican senators suggest, Biden’s statement actually supports the Senate doing its job in this case.
Out of a 20-page speech, Republicans selected one sentence from a 20-page speech and declared it the Biden rule, the one they were following. But another playbook informs their actions.
That term refers to Southern refusal to abide by the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, a particularly shameful chapter in our history.
Stunned by the court’s action finally striking down Jim Crow, the Virginia General Assembly met in special session to address what it viewed as an incursion on states’ rights. Columnist James Kilpatrick advised lawmakers that interposition supported repudiating federal authority. Gov. Thomas Stanley denounced the court’s actions as unlawful and unconstitutional. Buoyed by U.S. Sen. Harry Byrd, Stanley established a commission to determine how to respond. Just as today, the shutdown was a favored strategy. Virginia’s Prince Edward County, an A student in this regard, stopped levying taxes for education and kept its schools closed for five years.
Like Virginia’s post-Brown lawmakers, today’s Republicans confront the prospect of the social order upending. Obama, whom McConnell pledged to make a one-term president, now has the opportunity to change the highest court in the land for generations to come. Like Virginia’s lawmakers of that period, today’s senators responded to the threat Obama poses by declaring his actions as unconstitutional, illegitimate and overreaching. And, like those lawmakers of yore, senators threw a wrench in the workings of government instead of accepting an outcome they disliked.
And, just like Virginia’s lawmakers, these senators are wrong.
They would do themselves, the nation and the Supreme Court a service by turning to the right playbook this time. The one Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch has written about at length.
As published by Cincinnati.com on March 22, 2016.
Eric Kearney Named CEO of African American Chamber
CEO Sean Rugless is leaving the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky African American Chamber of Commerce to start his own consulting firm and former state Sen. Eric Kearney will replace him, the group announced Thursday.
Kearney, an attorney, was the Democratic leader in the Ohio Senate and before entering politics Kearney co-owned owned Sesh Communications with his wife, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, which publishes the Cincinnati Herald, the Northern Kentucky Herald and the Dayton Defender newspapers.
“I am humbled and excited to work in this role,” Eric Kearney said. “I look forward to working with our stakeholders and membership to connect opportunities that drive positive business outcomes.”
Kearney was selected by Democratic gubernatorial nominee Ed FitzGerald to be his running mate in 2013, but later left the ticket after news reports about back taxes owed by Sesh Communications. The company disputed some of the taxes it was said to owe.
Rugless will launch the Katalyst Group, a strategic consulting and branding firm.
The African American chamber “has grown to be an important economic partner and is perfectly positioned to ensure success for its members,” Rugless said. “The same entrepreneurial spirit that ignites our members has fueled my dream of working with clients to enhance business models, connect with consumers and provide business solutions to their specific marketing challenges.”
As published on Cincinnati Business Courier on March 24, 2016
Law Alum, Cincinnati Bengals EVP Katie Blackburn featured in Cincinnati Enquirer Profile
BOCA RATON, Florida – In the annual National Football League meetings at the Boca Raton Resort and Club, which sits just off Lake Boca Raton, league coaches and executives conducted various forms of league business, from the consideration and institution of new rules to larger-scale topics such as the placement of a franchise in Europe.
When these topics are discussed formally within the offset meeting rooms inside the 90-year-old hotel, the talks come in the form of the league’s four labor committees, six football operations committees, seven finance committees and nine business committees.
The Cincinnati Bengals are represented within five of those groups. Owner and president Mike Brown sits on the management council executive committee for labor, while executive vice president Katie Blackburn is the chairwoman of the eight-person workplace diversity committee and the Super Bowl advisory committee. She also sits on the CBA player benefit plans committee. Vice president Troy Blackburn sits on the employee benefits committee.
The membership with those miniature associations may not seem that momentous on the surface in 2016, especially for Katie Blackburn. She is not the only woman in these groups – Dallas’ Charlotte Anderson (chair of the NFL Foundation and conduct), Cleveland’s Dee Haslam (legislative and conduct), Tennessee’s Jenneen Kaufman (employee benefits committee), Buffalo’s Kim Pegula (Super Bowl advisory, NFL Foundation) and Denise DeBartolo-York (Hall of Fame) all have prominent roles.
But, Blackburn’s role as chairwoman of two very important committees isn’t to be overlooked.“While I was in the league, I served on several committees, and it was quite apparent to me that the league puts considerable thought into who chairs its committees,” said Amy Trask, an NFL analyst for CBS Sports who was the first woman to be named chief executive officer of a franchise when she took that position in Oakland in 1997.
“Committees are very important within the structure of the league. And I don’t believe that the league would appoint as chairperson someone in whom it didn’t have tremendous faith.”
And it is Blackburn’s role on the workplace diversity committee that has earned her more attention than usual over the last two months. It began when NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said at the Super Bowl that the “Rooney rule,” in which at least one minority candidate must be interviewed for coaching and executive football positions, will also include women when it comes to openings in the league office.
According to an Enquirer profile in 2000, Blackburn became the first woman in NFL front offices to handle player contract negotiations, and her standing in the league has only grown in import since.“I think she is (an important voice),” said New York Giants owner John Mara, who is on the diversity committee.
“She does a great job heading up that committee. I think the diversity committee has made some great strides. The league has made some great strides over the last few years in terms of having a more diverse workforce, and I think she should get a lot credit for that.”
Blackburn has always been reticent to speak about herself, especially when the spotlight of league business turns her direction and highlights some pioneering aspects of her career. “No, I mean, I don’t look at it so much that way,” she told The Enquirer quietly in a foyer just off a breezeway at the resort. “I just view it as really trying to get people to do things that are in overall best interest of everyone. But I don’t like to think of it as pioneering because there are so many other people who have done way, so much more. I couldn’t even put myself in the same category.”
But make no mistake; she commands an important place in the league and is viewed that way in ownership circles.“I think she’s very respected around the league,” said Mara, who acknowledged that Brown remains active and vocal in league matters. “She’s been around long enough and has her own qualifications. She’s very bright. When she speaks, she’s always very articulate, very intelligent, so people know who she is and people respect her.” As for the inclusion of women as part of the Rooney Rule, Blackburn notes that it does not apply to each individual team – but it may serve each organization to think along those lines regardless.
“It’s a great best practice for every team to use because you’re going to look at a wider array of candidates and hopefully get a better person to fill any position that’s open,” she said. “So I think in the long run it does work best if people actually implement it. But I think it’s been put in front of people enough that people are doing wider searches and interviewing more diversely for openings, so I think they are doing it.”
With that, the conversation about her ended, and she smiled as she moved toward the elevator.But Blackburn’s role as the chair of such an important committee during a time when diversity and inclusion are at the forefront in many workplace discussions only indicates she will continue to be a strong presence within the league – even if her voice isn’t resonating publicly.
“Katie can be as important a voice as she chooses to be, and that’s entirely up to Katie – to state the obvious,” Trask said. “If Katie wishes to be a voice, she will be tremendous. If she opts not to, that’s her decision. “As Polonius said in Hamlet, he said to Laertes, ‘To thine own self be true,’ and Katie is going to make the decision that is best for her and the Bengals' franchise, as she should. Can she be a very important voice? Absolutely, positively. Whatever she chooses will be the right decision.”
This article was first published by Cincinnati.Com on March 23, 2015 and the same reserve all copyrights for this article.
Professor Stephanie McMahon Featured in Story Examining Whether Tax Rates Influence Where Families Live
Professor Stephanie McMahon was featured in WalletHub’s recent piece about 2016's states with the highest and lowest tax rates. She shares how taxes influence where families choose to live in a small way and why.
You can find the piece here.
Dean Joseph Tomain Gives Energy Policy Presentation at American and French Universities
In March Dean Tomain gave a lecture entitled Clean Power Politics: The Democratization of Energy, at Miami for a class hosted by its University Institute for the Environment and Sustainability. He also gave a seminar on The Past, Present and Future of US Energy Policy to the trial and appellate lawyers of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Dean Tomain delivered a lecture to the Faculty of Law and the Faculty of Mining at the University of Lorraine in Nancy France. Finally, he delivered a workshop on The Clean Power Plan and the Democratization of Energy at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law.
Professor Tim Armstrong’s book review accepted for publication
Professor Tim Armstrong’s book review titled Two Comparative Perspectives on Copyright's Past and Future in the Digital Age has been accepted for publication in the John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law. The essay critically evaluates two recent high-profile titles on digital copyright law: The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle by Peter Baldwin (Princeton, 2014) and Copyfight: The Global Politics of Digital Copyright Reform by Blayne Haggart (Univ. of Toronto, 2014).
Professor Michael Solimine co-authored an amicus curiae brief filed in Shapiro v. McManus, 136 S. Ct. 450 (2015)
Professor Michael Solimine co-authored an amicus curiae brief filed in Shapiro v. McManus, 136 S. Ct. 450 (2015), arguing that the lower court decision should be reversed. The case concerned the powers of a single district judge in deciding whether to convene a three-judge district court. In December, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided the case in a unanimous decision agreeing with the argument asserted in the amicus curiae brief.